大般涅槃經集解 65.74

65.74

案僧亮曰：若有二佛，眾生則不生難遭之想。而或者聞此說已，謂十方界皆無，所以起諍也。僧宗曰：第二十諍論也。若論正義者，就應用之中，此間一化唯有一佛。不解此意者，言十方無餘佛也。聞說有十方佛，便言俱有十方佛，無別法身，是則傷於本迹。二論相諍，俱失理也。寶亮曰：眾生聞有十方佛，作是念：若此間佛法嚴念，我當向彼間佛學也。欲捉物心，故云一世間中無二佛也。若聞有者，便言佛佛不相關；若言無者，但得有一，是故諍論也。

Sengliang comments: If there were two Buddhas, sentient beings would not generate the thought that they are rare to encounter. Yet some hearing this statement thought that none exist in the realms of the ten directions, which is why disputes arose. Sengzong says: This is the twentieth dispute. In terms of the correct doctrine, in the context of responsive functioning, within a single transformation here there is only one Buddha. Those who do not understand this intent say that there are no other Buddhas in the ten directions. Hearing that there are Buddhas of the ten directions, they say that Buddhas of the ten directions all exist simultaneously without a separate dharmakāya; this damages the original and the trace. The two treatises disputing with each other both lose the principle. Baoliang says: When sentient beings hear of Buddhas of the ten directions, they think: 'If this Buddha's Dharma here is rigorous and demanding, I shall go to that Buddha over there to learn.' Wishing to seize the minds of beings, he said that within one world there are not two Buddhas. If hearing that they exist, they say that Buddha and Buddha are unrelated; if saying they do not exist, there can only be one; therefore disputes arise.