大般涅槃經集解 71.50

71.50

案僧亮曰：是堅守性，故名為水。然流動性同，若動不失流守性，不名為風耶？若動不名風以下，若濕多屬水，凍時堅多應屬地也。豈是從緣得名乎？寶亮曰：若凍時猶屬水者，波本因風而動，應名波為風；若不名波為風，亦不應凍為水也。

Sengliang comments: Because this maintains a solid nature, it is called water. However, the nature of flowing and motion is the same; if moving does not lose the nature of flowing and maintaining, would it not be called wind? In the passage below starting from "if moving is not called wind," if having more wetness pertains to water, then having more solidity when frozen should pertain to earth. How could its name be obtained from conditions? Baoliang comments: If it still pertains to water when frozen, waves originally move due to wind and should be named wind; if waves are not named wind, freezing should likewise not be considered water.