大般涅槃經義記 8.120

8.120

就下釋中，先自徵責，我有何以為此徵問？釋中，「諸法無一、無二」舉深形淺。「一種、二種是凡夫相」明淺非深。一、二既是凡夫之相，何假具嚴方能問答？

Concerning the explanation below, he first presses himself: "On what basis do I formulate this pressing question?" Within the explanation, "all dharmas are without oneness and without dualness" adduces the profound to contrast with the shallow. "The single kind and dual kinds are marks of ordinary beings" clarifies that the shallow is not the profound. Since the one and the two are marks of ordinary beings, why depend on possessing the adornments before being able to question and answer?