涅槃經遊意 1.199

1.199

云、次難復解：若言斥昔涅槃，故言三德者，此名數殊不相組對，如破邪三寶則言正三寶。今破二涅槃明二德，又以法身般若斥無餘者，亦應以解脫常住斥彼有餘，何者昔日有餘，何但解脫未足，亦非常住？今若正言解脫，不言常住者，亦應無餘，正言法身，不言般若。

It is said: A second difficulty further resolves [or challenges it]: If one says that it speaks of the three virtues in order to reject the past [conception of] nirvāṇa, these names and numbers do not correspond at all—just as when refuting the heterodox three jewels, one speaks of the correct three jewels. Now, refuting the two nirvāṇas, it explains two virtues; and furthermore, using the dharmakāya and prajñā to reject [nirvāṇa] without remainder, one should likewise use eternal liberation to reject their [nirvāṇa] with remainder. Why? In the past, with remainder, how could it be merely that liberation was incomplete? It was also not eternally abiding. If one now speaks correctly of liberation without speaking of eternal abiding, then for [nirvāṇa] without remainder, one should also speak correctly only of the dharmakāya without speaking of prajñā.