涅槃經遊意 1.251

1.251

今謂此之解皆不可。初云皆頓知不可者，汝既都未見理，亦應都未斷惑；若少分斷惑，則應少分見理。又且不見理則無智慧，無智慧以何除惑耶？

Now we say that none of these explanations is acceptable. As for the first saying that both are cognized suddenly being unacceptable: since you have not seen the principle at all, you should also not have severed afflictions at all; if you have severed afflictions in a small part, you should have seen the principle in a small part. Furthermore, if one does not see the principle, there is no wisdom; without wisdom, by what means could one eliminate afflictions?