注維摩詰經 6.236

6.236

肇曰：言久於前，責實於後，故莫知所答也。生曰：既言解脫無久，跡為實無也。解脫苟以無為實者，言亦實有也。有無相乖，豈可得以言解脫？是以託用斯默，以明解脫非實無矣。解脫既非實無，然後止言，乃可得必同之矣。

[Seng]zhao says: Having spoken of length previously and being pressed on the reality afterward, he did not know how to answer. [Dao]sheng says: Having said that liberation has no duration, its trace is real non-existence. If liberation takes non-existence as real, the statement also has real existence. Existence and non-existence conflict with each other; how could liberation be expressed in words? Therefore, he resorted to this silence to make clear that liberation is not real non-existence. Since liberation is not real non-existence, only then can dwelling and words necessarily be identified with it.