維摩義記 4.15

4.15

In the twenty-ninth [statement], "Ratnamudrāhasta said" indicates the person who speaks separately. Below, what he said is clarified. "'Delighting in nirvāṇa and not delighting in the mundane world are two'" points back to the signs of duality. Below, he overturns these two to clarify nonduality, where the double elimination of the two signs constitutes nonduality. First he differentiates, and then he concludes. In differentiating, he first says "not delighting in nirvāṇa and not reviling the mundane world, there is no duality," briefly differentiating its signs. "Therefore..." and what follows explains it, first investigating and then explaining. As for "if there is bondage, then there is liberation," this explains nonduality in reverse. "If there is originally no bondage, who seeks liberation?": this directly explains nonduality; this eliminates the two dharmas. "Without bondage and without liberation, there is no delight or revulsion": this refutes and eliminates the two dispositions; there is no liberation to delight in and no bondage to revile. "This is..." and what follows concludes.