維摩經玄疏 6.27

6.27

二、約不共說般若明法性實相為大乘經體一向異者，二乘所見偏真，不得言同也。就此為二意：一，別教；二，圓教。

Second, clarifying that the true mark of dharma-nature as the substance of Mahāyāna sūtras is entirely different in terms of the expounding of unshared prajñā: what is seen by the two vehicles is the one-sided true, and one cannot speak of similarity. Under this there are two points: first, the distinctive teaching; second, the perfect teaching.