Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

維摩經略疏 9.69

維摩經略疏 9.69

Language
Classical Chinese

9.69

此復何異?答:若通教未悟作此計者,乃是隨情之說。若悟真者,乃是悟思議不生不滅偏真之門,非是不二中道門也。今此中明不生不滅,並不同上所說,束以凡夫為生。故《大集》云「出法攝心」。凡夫依有漏禪還受生死,二乘及通教所證涅槃同皆是滅,如下滅法攝心。今明不生,非凡夫;不滅,非二乘涅槃之滅。正破二乘所證涅槃,滅於化城;不同通教,不破聖人所得。凡夫受分段生,二乘受變易報。今入不二門,則離此二邊,中道為門。故龍樹偈云「雖未脫死地,則為已得脫。」若約通教釋,菩薩已斷正使餘有受生,是慈悲為物,非己實報,故云已得脫。若約別教意,已斷分段侵除無明,即分分中脫,未脫者未免餘生故。

How does this differ again?
Answer: If one has not awakened in the shared teaching and forms this conception, it is an explanation according to sentiment. If one has awakened to the truth, it is an awakening to the partial truth gate of conceivable non-arising and non-ceasing, not the gate of the non-dual Middle Way. Now, the clarification here of neither arising nor ceasing is completely different from what was discussed above. Summing it up, ordinary beings are arising; hence the Mahāsaṃnipāta says: 'Leaving dharmas to collect the mind.' Ordinary beings, relying on contaminated dhyāna, return to receive birth-and-death. The nirvāṇa realized by the two vehicles and the shared teaching is equally ceasing, as below: 'extinguishing dharmas to collect the mind.' Now, clarifying non-arising is not [the arising of] ordinary beings; non-ceasing is not the ceasing of the nirvāṇa of the two vehicles. It directly refutes the nirvāṇa realized by the two vehicles, extinguishing it in the conjured city; unlike the shared teaching, it refutes what the sages have attained. Ordinary beings undergo delimited birth, and the two vehicles receive the retribution of transformation. Now, entering the gate of non-duality is departing from these two extremes, taking the Middle Way as the gate. Therefore Nāgārjuna's verse says: 'Although not yet free from the ground of death, one is considered already freed.' If explained according to the shared teaching, the bodhisattva has already severed the principal afflictions and what remains is undergoing birth; this is out of compassion for beings, not one's own actual retribution, so it is said 'already freed.' If according to the intent of the distinct teaching, having already severed delimited [birth-and-death] and encroached upon and eliminated fundamental ignorance, one is freed fraction by fraction; those who are 'not yet freed' are so because they have not yet avoided remaining births.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)