維摩經略疏垂裕記 1.171

1.171

二、「問若」下，簡名前後。問意者，荊溪云：心通觀別。今云觀心乃別前通後，如何得例通別二序？答意者，準世名便，不可即云心觀故也。然亦且順此土之言，若從西方，心觀何爽。

Second, from "Question: if..." below, querying the sequence of the names. As for the intent of the question, Jingxi says: "Mind is common and contemplation is distinct. Now saying 'contemplating the mind' places the distinct before the common; how can this serve as an analogy for the two prefaces of common and distinct?" As for the intent of the answer: following worldly conventional convenience, one cannot immediately say 'mind-contemplation.' However, this also merely accords with the speech of this land; if following the Western regions, how could 'mind-contemplation' be wrong?