維摩經略疏垂裕記 3.30

3.30

從「若非佛」去，釋於得益之相，非辨形聲。「問此」下，荊溪云：此既現土，親能表土。何名為由？由但正報，仍分近遠。答中意者，然此頌中先歎於由，次頌表發，故不可以由為表發也，故於答中便破他釋。

From "If not the Buddha" onward, it explains the characteristics of obtaining benefit, not distinguishing form and voice. Under "Questioning this," Jingxi says: Since this manifests the land, it can directly express the land. Why is it called the cause? The cause is only the direct reward, yet still divided into near and far. The meaning in the answer is: in this verse, it first praises the cause, and the next verse expresses and manifests it; therefore, one cannot take the cause to be the expressing and manifesting. Hence, in the answer, it directly refutes other explanations.