維摩經略疏垂裕記 3.36

3.36

二、料簡，二：初、對二諦簡。荊溪云：上用二諦等者，指上善能分別等文。智既照諦，說必依智，何得前後二三不同？答意如前。二、對邪小簡。荊溪云：外道等者，欲簡諸教眾多雙非顯圓雙非，故設斯問。答中具答雙非不一。

Second, distinguishing and resolving, [which has] two [parts]: First, distinguishing in contrast to the two truths. Jingxi says: Regarding "Above, the two truths were used" and so forth: this refers to the above text on "skilfully able to distinguish" and so on. Since wisdom illuminates the truths, preaching must rely on wisdom; how could the earlier and later [passages] differ between two and three? The meaning of the reply is as before. Second, distinguishing in contrast to heterodox and lesser [teachings]. Jingxi says: Regarding "The heterodox" and so forth: in order to distinguish the numerous double negations of the various teachings and reveal the double negation of the perfect [teaching], this question was raised. In the reply, it fully answers that the double negations are not uniform.