維摩經略疏垂裕記 4.115

4.115

十九、示在帝釋。「十五觀門」者，待檢敘之。「別教金剛已還皆無常」者，荊溪云：此他所計，今因判之令屬別教。又梵王保常過於帝釋，自謂眾生之父母。故今梵不以無常為治者，諸梵已得深根本禪，但以勝慧奪其有漏。剎利婆羅門等通皆保常，此亦置通而從於別各別說之，良由此也。又復亦欲示於教門種種不同令遍識故，故各各說。

Nineteen, "Manifesting as Śakra." Regarding the "fifteen contemplation gates," we await examining and stating them. Regarding "Before the diamond[-like mind] of the separate teaching, all are impermanent," Jingxi says: "This was what others posited; now, based on that, it is classified and made to belong to the separate teaching. Moreover, the Brahma king presumes upon permanence more than Śakra, considering himself the father and mother of sentient beings. Therefore, the reason why Brahmā is not treated here through impermanence is that the Brahmās have already attained profound fundamental dhyāna, and he merely uses superior wisdom to divest them of the outflow-bound. The kṣatriyas, brāhmaṇas, and so forth, universally presume upon permanence; here too, he sets aside the general and follows the particular to expound it individually, which truly stems from this. Furthermore, he also wishes to show that the teaching gates have various differences so as to make them known comprehensively; hence he expounds them individually."