維摩經略疏垂裕記 5.117

5.117

二、「法無」下，隨釋，二：初、明七番，七：初、法無有比，二：初、正約三解。荊溪云：初云無相待者，無我是絕，絕彼待故。故從心絕不從事絕，事絕無窮絕還不絕。心約實理，理即法性，法性本無，尚亦無絕，有何不絕？「相待之惑自然而滅」者，智稱法性方乃名滅，是故法性亦滅於絕。

Second, from "the Dharma is without..." downward, explaining in turn, in two parts: first, explaining the seven turns; [divided into] seven: first, the Dharma is without comparison, in two parts: first, properly interpreted in terms of the three [teachings]. Jingxi says: First, saying that there is no relativity means that no-self is absolute, because it terminates that relativity. Therefore it is terminated from the mind, not from phenomena; terminating phenomena is endless, and what is terminated still remains unterminated. The mind accords with the real principle; the principle is precisely the Dharma-nature. The Dharma-nature is fundamentally non-existent; even termination does not exist [therein]—what then could remain unterminated? Regarding "the defilement of relativity is naturally extinguished": only when wisdom accords with the Dharma-nature is it then called extinguished; therefore, the Dharma-nature also extinguishes the absolute.