維摩經略疏垂裕記 6.124

6.124

二、料簡，二：初、顯圓教所攝。荊溪云：非偏非圓者，亦可云是偏是圓，即別教也，約地前後而分偏圓。二、對佛眼辨相。「名佛天眼」者，欲簡偏故加佛字。例應四眼悉宜加佛，區以別之。「金剛般若」者，佛歷五眼以問，善吉悉答云有，具如前引。

Second, analysis and evaluation, in two: first, revealing that it is subsumed under the Perfect Teaching. Jingxi says: "Neither biased nor perfect: it may also be said to be both biased and perfect, which is precisely the Separate Teaching; biased and perfect are distinguished in terms of before and after the grounds." Second, distinguishing the marks in contrast to the Buddha eye. Regarding "named the Buddha heavenly eye": intending to distinguish it from the biased, the character 'Buddha' is added. By analogy, all four eyes should have 'Buddha' added to demarcate and differentiate them. Regarding the Diamond Prajñā [Sūtra]: the Buddha questioned through the five eyes, and Subhūti answered in all cases that they exist, fully as cited earlier.