維摩經略疏垂裕記 6.41

6.41

二、問愜有邪法，三：初、敘意分科。荊溪云：何以猶具見思等者，亦以體異名同為訶。善吉具有界外鄙惡，鄙惡是賊，何名殺賊？必是生，故非不生。是賊必是生，安堪應供？無此三德，羅漢不成。

Second, the query regarding possessing heterodox dharmas has three [parts]: first, narrating the intent and dividing the sections. Jingxi says: Why does one still possess view and thought [defilements]? They are also reproached on the grounds that the substance is different while the name is the same. Subhūti possesses the vile evils outside the realm. Vile evils are thieves; how can this be called "slaying the thief"? It is inevitably birth, hence not "unborn." Since it is a thief, it must be subject to birth; how is he fit to receive offerings? Lacking these three virtues, the arhat is not accomplished.