維摩經略疏垂裕記 7.127

7.127

二、明淨名難破智斷非如，二：初、牒經示義。二、結句重釋。初即約如體，次即約如事。故荊溪云：體乃約理，四句從事。事理雖二，推使不二也。事理即是智境相依，隨理偏圓皆有事理。初、牒經示義，二：初、牒經。二、「難意」下，示義，二：初、示義。二、「若如」下，結難。

Second, explaining Jingming's refutation showing that wisdom and eradication are not thusness, in two parts: first, citing the sūtra to demonstrate the meaning; second, summarizing with the closing sentence for a re-explanation. The first is in terms of the substance of thusness, and the second is in terms of the phenomena of thusness. Thus Jingxi states: 'The substance is in terms of principle, while the four propositions follow phenomena. Although phenomena and principle are two, investigating them makes them non-dual.' Phenomena and principle are precisely the mutual reliance of wisdom and its objective realm; following principle, whether biased or perfect, both possess phenomena and principle. The first, citing the sūtra to demonstrate the meaning, has two parts: first, citing the sūtra; second, from 'The intention of the difficulty' downward, demonstrating the meaning, in two parts: first, demonstrating the meaning; second, from 'If thusness' downward, concluding the difficulty.