維摩經略疏垂裕記 7.141

7.141

二、正結並，二：初、標示。二、正釋，二：初、約教，二：初、通教。二、別圓。於中約圓消此結文，以理同難事異其意彌顯，何妨方等對彼圓機，直示一切悉皆得記，於圓成顯、於二成密。況亦不妨依荊溪釋，以方等機故。

Second, the correct concluding parallel, in two parts: first, indicating the topic; second, the correct explanation, in two parts: first, in terms of the teachings, in two parts: first, the common teaching; second, the separate and perfect teachings. Therein, explaining this concluding text in terms of the perfect: challenging the difference in phenomena by means of the identity in principle makes its meaning all the more evident; what prevents the Vaipulya from directly demonstrating that all receive prophecy when facing those of perfect capacities, becoming manifest for the perfect and esoteric for the two? Moreover, there is no harm in relying on Jingxi's explanation, because they are capacities of the Vaipulya.