維摩經略疏垂裕記 8.133

8.133

二、答，二：初、正答顯同。荊溪云：若答中意者，三土即是，何須別求？若爾，三尚遍有，三外虛通何得不有？若爾，虛通之有為與太虛同耶異耶？答：若同太虛，那遍三土？若異太虛，豈得通三？內外靈知，遍而非遍，四句推檢，通教顯真。

Second, the answer, which has two parts: first, properly answering to reveal identity. Jingxi states: The intention in the answer is: the three lands are precisely it, so why seek separately? If so, the three are still ubiquitously present; how could the pervasive openness outside the three not be present? If so, is this existence of pervasive openness the same as or different from empty space? Answer: If it were the same as empty space, how could it pervade the three lands? If it were different from empty space, how could it permeate the three? Spiritual awareness within and without pervades and yet does not pervade; examined through the four propositions, the common teaching reveals true reality.