金光明經文句記 1.163

1.163

初、明違教旨。《涅槃》正談深妙三德，合被圓機，豈唯二乘？《般若》具示三種般若，豈異三德？況云聽眾非生死人，寧止凡夫？《華嚴》三身亦即三德，具論十地，豈但被於始行菩薩？此解不獨攝機有限，抑亦彰法性非圓。

First, clarifying that it violates the purport of the teachings. The Nirvāṇa Sūtra properly expounds the deep and wondrous three virtues, fittingly addressing capacities of the Perfect [Teaching]; how could it be only for the two vehicles? The Prajñā Sūtra fully demonstrates the three kinds of prajñā; how could they differ from the three virtues? Moreover, it says that the audience members were not people of saṃsāra; would it be restricted to ordinary beings? In the Avataṃsaka, the three bodies are also the three virtues, and it fully treats the ten grounds; how could it address only initial-stage bodhisattvas? This interpretation not only limits the capacities gathered, but also suggests that the Dharma-nature is not complete and round.