金光明最勝王經疏 2.101

2.101

贊曰：釋也。應云於父生常想故、於父財物生常想故，二義合明。或由前喻但喻於財，不生難遭想，故今亦但徵釋於財。

The commentary says: The explanation. It should say: “Because they give rise to the notion of permanence regarding the father, and because they give rise to the notion of permanence regarding the father's wealth and goods,” explaining the two meanings together. Or, because the preceding simile only used wealth as a simile for not generating the thought of it being rare to encounter, therefore now it also only questions and explains regarding wealth.