金光明最勝王經疏 3.105

3.105

贊曰：重釋成。雖有分別體無分別，釋前無分別。雖有法身、三昧、智慧三數差別，而非分別心緣，非語境故，云體無分別。雖有三數而無三體，釋過一切相。雖有法身三昧智慧三數，而無條然別體。不增不減，釋非常非斷，不增故非常、不減故非斷。

Commentary: This re-explains and establishes [the point]. 'Although there is differentiation, in substance there is no differentiation' explains the previous 'cannot be conceptualized.' Although there is the numerical distinction of three—dharmakāya, samādhi, and wisdom—it is not an object of a conceptualizing mind nor a sphere of speech, so it is said that 'in substance there is no differentiation.' 'Although there is the number three, there are not three substances' explains 'transcending all marks.' Although there is the number three—dharmakāya, samādhi, and wisdom—there are no separate, isolated substances. 'Neither increase nor decrease' explains 'neither eternal nor annihilated': not increasing, they are not eternal; not decreasing, they are not annihilated.