金光明最勝王經疏 4.6

4.6

解妨者，問：《辨中邊論》及《攝論》等皆說，依十地、行十行，斷十障、證十如。此中何故不辨十如？答：略廣異故。問：諸餘經論說其十度，初六各三、後四各二。何故此經十波羅蜜皆有五種？答：一一行中各有多門，諸聖教中影略而說，故不一準。

Regarding resolving difficulties: Question: The *Madhyāntavibhāga-śāstra*, the *Mahāyānasaṃgraha*, and other texts all state that by relying on the ten stages and practicing the ten practices, one severs the ten obstacles and realizes the ten tathatās. Why are the ten tathatās not distinguished here? Answer: Because of differences between the abridged and the extensive. Question: Other sūtras and treatises state that among the ten perfections, the first six each have three [aspects], and the latter four each have two. Why do all ten pāramitās in this sūtra have five kinds? Answer: Each practice has multiple aspects; the various sacred teachings explain them by abridgement or synecdoche, and therefore they do not follow a single standard.