楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解 3.141

3.141

如世尊所說等，此大慧領如來所說諸妄想意為致問之端。彼彼者，正言彼諸妄想也。然諸法本無實性，但妄計耳，而大慧猶有疑者，謂若但是妄想自性，非諸法有自性，此自性與非自性相待者，豈非世尊所說染淨諸法皆無實性耶？大慧意以一切法無自性，妄想有自性為難。

'As the World-Honoured One has said,' and so forth: here Mahāmati takes up the intent of the various vikalpas spoken of by the Tathāgata to frame the beginning of his question. 'Various' directly refers to those various vikalpas. However, all dharmas originally have no real nature; they are merely falsely conceptualized. Yet Mahāmati still has doubts, meaning: if it is only the svabhāva of vikalpa and dharmas do not possess svabhāva, and this svabhāva and non-svabhāva are mutually relative, does this not mean that the defiled and pure dharmas spoken of by the World-Honoured One are all without real nature? Mahāmati's intention is to raise an objection on the grounds that all dharmas have no svabhāva while vikalpa has a svabhāva.