楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解 3.195

3.195

「復次大慧！爾時，世論婆羅門復問我言：『癡愛業因故，有三有耶？為無因耶？』我時報言：『此二者亦是世論耳。』彼復問言：『一切性皆入自共相耶？』我復報言：『此亦世論。婆羅門！乃至意流妄計外塵皆是世論。』復次大慧！爾時世論婆羅門復問我言：『頗有非世論者不？我是一切外道之宗，說種種句味因緣譬喻莊嚴。』我復報言：『婆羅門！有，非汝有者，非為非宗，非說非不說種種句味，非不因譬莊嚴。』婆羅門言：『何等為非世論、非非宗、非非說？』我時報言：『婆羅門！有非世論，汝諸外道所不能知，以於外性不實妄想虛偽計著故，謂妄想不生，覺了有無自心現量，妄想不生，不受外塵，妄想永息，是名非世論。此是我法、非汝有也。婆羅門！略說彼識，若來若去、若死若生、若樂若苦、若溺若見、若觸若著種種相，若和合相續、若愛、若因計著。婆羅門！如是比者是汝等世論，非是我有。』大慧！世論婆羅門作如是問，我如是答，彼即默然不辭而退，思自通處作是念言：『沙門釋子出於通外，說無生、無相、無因，覺自妄想現相妄想不生。』」

"Furthermore, Mahāmati, at that time the Lokāyata brāhmaṇa again questioned me, saying: 'Is the existence of the three realms caused by the karma of delusion and craving, or is it uncaused?' I then replied to him, saying: 'Both of these are also mere worldly philosophies (lokāyata).' He questioned me again, saying: 'Do all entities enter into individual and universal characteristics?' I replied again, saying: 'This too is worldly philosophy. Brāhmaṇa, up to the mind flowing and falsely conceptualizing external dust, all is worldly philosophy.' Furthermore, Mahāmati, at that time the Lokāyata brāhmaṇa again questioned me, saying: 'Is there anything that is not worldly philosophy? I am the master of all tīrthika doctrines, expounding various phrases and expressions with causes, conditions, and metaphorical adornments.' I replied again, saying: 'Brāhmaṇa, there is, but it is not what you possess. It is neither a non-doctrine nor does it speak or not speak various phrases and expressions; nor is it not adorned with causal metaphors.' The brāhmaṇa said: 'What is that which is not worldly philosophy, neither a non-doctrine, nor neither speaking [nor not speaking]?' I then replied, saying: 'Brāhmaṇa, there is that which is not worldly philosophy, which you tīrthikas cannot know. Because of false conceptualization, untruth, and grasping at external entities, [you do not know it]. It means that false conceptualization does not arise, one comprehends existence and nonexistence as cittadṛśyamātra, false conceptualization does not arise, one does not accept external dust, and false conceptualization ceases forever—this is named what is not worldly philosophy. This is my Dharma, not what you possess. Brāhmaṇa, to explain that consciousness briefly: whether coming or going, whether dying or being born, whether pleasure or pain, whether sinking or seeing, whether touching or adhering to various characteristics, whether compounding and continuing, whether craving, whether grasping at causes—Brāhmaṇa, such things as these are the worldly philosophy of you and your kind, not what I possess.' Mahāmati, when the Lokāyata brāhmaṇa made such inquiries and I answered in such a way, he remained silent, withdrew without taking leave, and thinking over his own mastery, had this thought: 'The Śramaṇa Gautama transcends what is within my mastery; he speaks of non-arising, signlessness, and causelessness, and having awakened to the manifested signs of one's own false conceptualizations, false conceptualization does not arise.'"