大方廣圓覺修多羅了義經略疏 2.1084

2.1084

夫覺體靈明，不唯寂滅。今滅惑住寂，豈得相應？況圓覺者非動非靜，雙融動靜，恒沙妙用無礙難思，住寂之心何能契合？言即似近，理即全疎。與理相違，故言非也。

Now the substance of enlightenment is spiritual and luminous; it is not merely quiescence. Now, putting an end to delusion and abiding in quiescence—how could that correspond [with enlightenment]? Furthermore, perfect enlightenment is neither dynamic nor static, blending both dynamic and static together; its wondrous functions, numerous as the sands of the Ganges, are unimpeded and inconceivable. How could a mind abiding in quiescence tally with it? In words it seems close, but in principle it is entirely estranged. Because it is contrary to principle, it is called 'not [the mark of quiescence].'