首楞嚴義疏注經 1.289

1.289

喻則近遠俱見，法則唯見山河。既失近觀，何成同喻？法喻不等，潛根理虧。下更縱破令無所據。

In the analogy, both near and far are seen; in the phenomenon, one only sees mountains and rivers. Since close observation is lost, how can it form a valid analogy? The phenomenon and analogy are unequal, so the principle of concealment within the faculties is deficient. Below he further concedes and refutes it so that it has no ground.