首楞嚴義疏注經 1.314

1.314

牒轉計也。此計由前以暗室暗例眼前暗，不合成內。恐彼計云：我所見暗與暗室暗二體不同。何也？彼暗室暗是身外暗，名為外見，以是開眼之所緣故。我所見暗是身內境，名為內對，以是合眼之所緣故。今取合眼所對之暗名為見內，非同所見室中暗爾，如何不得見暗名內？故此牒也。然諸師敘計殊不分明，蓋譯人巧略，但牒而已。有智請詳，無執麻矣。

This recapitulates the shifted proposition. This proposition arises because previously, using the darkness of a dark room to analogise the darkness before the eyes, it did not properly form the inside. Fearing that he might posit: the darkness I see and the darkness of a dark room are different in essence. Why? That darkness of a dark room is darkness outside the body, called seeing outside, because it is conditioned by opening the eyes. The darkness I see is an object inside the body, called an inner confrontation, because it is conditioned by closing the eyes. Now taking the darkness confronted by closing the eyes as seeing the inside, it is not the same as the darkness seen in a room; how then could seeing darkness not be called the inside? Therefore, this recapitulates it. However, the explanations of this proposition by various masters are not very clear; this is because the translator was skillful and concise, merely recapitulating it. Let the wise examine it closely, and do not cling to hemp [mistaking it for gold].