首楞嚴義疏注經 1.353

1.353

舉事破也。若眼名見，死者眼存，心識離體，豈說有見？有見非死，死必無見，稱見在眼，不其謬哉！

This is citing an actual fact to refute it. If the eye is said to see, then when the dead still have eyes remaining but their mental consciousness has departed the body, how could one speak of seeing? If there is seeing, they are not dead; being dead, there is definitely no seeing. To say that seeing resides in the eye—is that not mistaken?