首楞嚴義疏注經 8.177

8.177

問：十行位中豈有度相耶？答：前即依體起用，且論神通化物，未言滅除度相；今此攝用歸體，順寂滅義，故除度相。約義雖異，為行頗同。若不然者，豈有證真大士猶懷度生之相耶！

Question: Within the stages of the ten practices, could there really be any marks of delivering? Answer: Previously, [the text] relied on essence to give rise to functioning, and was discussing converting beings through supernormal powers, not yet speaking of extinguishing the marks of delivering. Now, gathering functioning to return to essence accords with the meaning of tranquil extinction, and therefore the marks of delivering are eliminated. Although different in terms of meaning, they are quite identical as practice. Were it not so, how could a great being who has realized reality still harbor the marks of delivering beings?