四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.404

2.404

七將心望境。如《母論》云：犯必託境，關心成業；心有增微，境有優劣故也。或心境俱重，人作人想殺；或境重心輕，人作非人想；或境輕心重，非人人想。論通一切，不局一戒。淫中自有輕重：畜生及人；人中有在家出家；在家中持戒破戒，出家五眾持戒破戒；乃至聖人。重同，報異。第二盜重者。天及人，乃至聖人；三寶差別，僧物最重。第三殺戒。《成論》云：如《六足毘曇》中說，殺邪見人，輕殺蟲蟻；此人污染世間，多損減故。第四妄戒。向在家人說重，向出家人說輕。

Seventh, viewing the mind in relation to the objective realm. As the *Vinayamātṛkā* says: 'A transgression must rely on a realm, and involves the mind to establish karma; for minds have degrees of intensity and realms have superiority and inferiority.' Or mind and realm are both grave: killing a human thinking them to be human; or the realm is grave while the mind is light: [killing] a human thinking them to be a non-human; or the realm is light while the mind is grave: [killing] a non-human thinking them to be human. The treatise applies generally to all and is not limited to one precept. Within sexual misconduct there is inherently light and grave: animals versus humans; among humans, there are lay and monastic; among lay, there are those who observe precepts and those who break precepts; among the monastic five assemblies, those who observe precepts and those who break precepts; up to noble persons. The gravity is identical, but the retribution differs. Second, the gravity of theft: devas and humans, up to noble persons; among the distinctions of the Three Jewels, saṃgha property is the gravest. Third, the precept against killing: the *Satyasiddhiśāstra* says, as stated in the *Ṣaḍdharmasaṃgraha-abhidharma*, killing a person of wrong views is lighter than killing insects and ants, because such a person defiles the world and causes much harm. Fourth, the precept against lying: speaking to a layperson is grave, speaking to a monastic is light.