四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.445

2.445

Furthermore, the above explanation was discussed generally regarding the original and different objects; hence it was said there are definitely five, or either four or five clauses. If one relies solely on the presence or absence of transgression regarding the original object, all object ideations: four is equally four, meaning original bewilderment; five is uniformly five, meaning shifted ideation. It is just that the texts alternate in their descriptions. In applying these transgressions and the like, all rely on the original object and original ideation; as for the subsequent mind regarding a different object, the Vinaya does not charge it with that offense (e.g., when the thullaccaya of doubt or ideation of a non-human occurs, it is the thullaccaya of the original ideation; at the time of subsequently producing the doubt or ideation of a non-human, one only incurs a duṣkṛta. Endowed with the five conditions, killing a non-human is a thullaccaya; now thinking it is a human, it is also a duṣkṛta).