四分律行事鈔資持記 1.1077
四分律行事鈔資持記 1.1077
- Language
- Classical Chinese
1.1077
緣中,初科;示所依中,前引四分,初簡非處。律因比丘在樹上大小便,樹神瞋,故制。若樹下,示可依處。樹是頭陀,屋通喧靜;並舉極小,自外準知。上約僧居。若依下五種,並據俗舍。上四暫居處,下一久住處。並因緣起,佛皆許之。初明可依,後明移徙。牧,養也。聚落名通大小,乃至一家男女所居,皆是聚落。移徙中,隨所去者,隨上五種人所移處也。或可彼人移去,資具有闕,隨比丘意別往皆得。文中不約住意以斷得失,即是不了。故引《五分》決之。文分為二:初明開去。言住意者,謂審彼五家在此竟夏,方可依之;必無久意,不可依住,移應失夏。若在下,次明非處。上別列命難,下總收二難。
Under conditions, in the first heading: in indicating what one relies upon, first the Dharmaguptaka-vinaya is cited, initially excluding improper places. The Vinaya states that because a bhikṣu defecated and urinated in a tree, the tree deity grew angry, so the prohibition was instituted. From "under a tree" onward, it shows permissible places to rely upon. A tree pertains to dhūta practices, while a house admits both noisy and quiet surroundings; both are given as extreme minimums, and others may be understood by analogy. The above refers to monastic dwellings. From "if relying upon..." through the five types below, all refer to lay dwellings. The first four are temporary dwellings, and the last one is a long-term dwelling. All arose from causal circumstances, and the Buddha permitted them all. First it explains what is permissible to rely upon, and afterward it explains moving. "Pasturing" (mu) means raising livestock. The term "settlement" (ju luo) applies generally to large and small, down to where the men and women of a single household reside—all are settlements. In "moving," "following wherever they go" means following the place to which the five kinds of people above have relocated. Or perhaps when those people move away and material requisites are lacking, the bhikṣu may go elsewhere as he wishes, and that is also permitted. Because the text does not determine validity based on the [layperson's] intention to stay, it is not explicit; therefore the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya is cited to resolve it. That text is divided into two: first, clarifying the permission to leave. "Intention to stay" means verifying that those five households intend to remain here throughout the summer before one may rely on them; if they definitely have no intention of staying long, one must not rely on them and dwell there, and moving would result in losing the summer. From "if at..." below, next it clarifies improper places. The upper part specifically lists mortal dangers, and the lower part subsumes the two kinds of dangers.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation