四分律行事鈔資持記 1.1124

1.1124

雜辨中，初科。忘不受日者，以《五百問》中有此開文，故問以別之。答中，初明開者。此實迷心，故開憶悔。必有濫託，則非教意。一坐下，示制。以教太緩，故須限約。必過三悔，縱實亦破。注示憶悔之相，即返界者，疾還本處受日往也。

Under 'Miscellaneous analyses', in the first heading: 'Forgetting to receive days': because the Five Hundred Questions contains this exception text, a question is raised to distinguish it. In the answer, first it clarifies the exception: this is truly a confused mind, so an exception is made for repenting upon remembering. If there is fraudulent reliance, that is not the intention of the teaching. Under 'at one sitting...', it shows the regulation. Because the teaching is too lenient, it must be restricted. If it exceeds three repentances, even if genuine, it is broken. The note shows the manner of repenting upon remembering: 'directly returning to the boundary' means swiftly returning to the original place to receive days before going.