四分律行事鈔資持記 1.299

1.299

破古中，初出彼解。由執體故，即為受戒四句所妨，遂曲釋云：彼不知得戒，謂在數外。此下一句直破。何下，雙難。上約不知難乖宗，下文約知難乖法。五十祇中，和尚在外；《四分》限定中國十人。

In refuting the ancient view: first, it presents their interpretation. Because they clung to essence, they were hindered by the four propositions on receiving the precepts, and thereupon tortuously explained: 'That not knowing results in obtaining the precepts means they were outside the count.' The single sentence from 'Here' onward directly refutes this. From 'How' onward, there is a double objection. The upper part objects that not knowing contradicts the school's doctrine; the lower text objects that knowing contradicts the Dharma. In the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya of fifty, the upādhyāya is outside [the count]; the Dharmaguptaka strictly limits the Central Country to ten persons.