四分律行事鈔資持記 1.325

1.325

外儀中，上二文如前。《四分》中，初示文。彼但云不應爾，即是訶責。坐立既乖，理非和相；故判別眾。即如前引應來等文，彼非和相，故說別眾；顯今不坐，相亦非和，是別不疑。如下，引例。足食戒中，明約四儀辨之。下句會同，即指當科。

Under "External Demeanor": the two passages above are as before. Under the Dharmaguptaka-vinaya, it first presents the text. That [vinaya] merely says "one should not do so," which is a reprimand. Since sitting and standing are contrary, by principle it is not a sign of harmony; therefore, it is judged as dividing the Saṃgha. This is like the previously cited passage on "those who should come," etc.: that is not a sign of harmony, and therefore it is called dividing the Saṃgha; this makes clear that present failure to sit is also not a sign of harmony, and is unmistakably divisive. As below, it cites an analogy. In the precept on taking sufficient food, it is explained by distinguishing the four postures. The later phrase brings them to an agreement, referring to this very section.