四分律行事鈔資持記 1.377

1.377

結斷中，初三句正判。皆不成者，通收二處也。說不成者，局僧中也。知下，示犯。罪通自他，令僧成別，自即違教，二並吉羅；今此文中，且從自說。下引律文。一證不成，二令再與。彼列五種欲已云：若不現相、不口說，皆不成等，如文所引。疏云：前既非法，能所乖儀，故更簡人；秉法方詣故也。

In "Concluding judgment": The first three sentences provide a direct determination. "All are invalid" covers both places generally. "Declared invalid" is restricted to being within the Saṃgha. "Knowing..." below indicates the offense. The offense applies to both self and other: causing the Saṃgha to become a factional assembly, and oneself violating the teaching; both are duṣkṛta. Now in this text, it is explained temporarily with respect to oneself. Below, the Vinaya text is cited: first to prove it is invalid, second to require giving it again. That text, having listed the five kinds of chanda, states: "If one does not manifest marks, does not speak orally, all are invalid, etc.," as cited in the text. The commentary states: "Since the former was not according to Dharma, and both subject and object deviated from proper deportment, one must choose a person again; only then may one undertake the Dharma and proceed."