四分律行事鈔資持記 1.54

1.54

互融中。二教即二世教。此有二釋：前教本為未來，即兼佛世；後教本興現在，仍通像末。或可恐疑引用《五分》，故此釋之。彼此兩字，即指二宗。謂《四分》制已更開，即兼在世；《五分》雖制不用，亦兼未來。既而彼此相兼，即知本宗自具二世；但文不顯，故用彼文。問：遮性中亦明開制，與此何別？答：前通遮性，此唯在遮。若是性戒，不論時處。故《了論》中一切時處毘尼，謂婬盜等是也。

In [the section on] mutual integration, the "two teachings" are the teachings of the two eras. Here there are two explanations: the former teaching was originally for the future, which thus includes the Buddha's lifetime; the latter teaching originally arose for the present, yet still extends through the Semblance and Final ages. Alternatively, fearing there might be doubts about citing the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya, it is explained in this way. The two words "this" and "that" refer to the two schools. That is to say, in the Dharmaguptaka-vinaya, granting exceptions after prohibiting also includes the lifetime; in the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya, not employing what was prohibited also includes the future. Since both encompass each other, we know our own school fundamentally possesses both eras; but because its text is not explicit, we use that text. Question: Exceptions and prohibitions are also explained under the prohibitive and intrinsic [precepts]; what is the difference between that and this? Answer: The former encompasses both prohibitive and intrinsic precepts; this applies only to the prohibitive. If it is an intrinsic precept, neither time nor place is considered. Therefore, in the Vinayadvāviṃśatividyā-śāstra, the "vinaya of all times and places" refers to sexual misconduct, theft, and the like.