四分律行事鈔資持記 1.839

1.839

次問，可解。私謂，各專一法，故互有無耳。下指《義鈔》，準彼續難云：若爾結集法藏，亦在眾作，何以白差？答：結集為僧，不為別人；若不差，不知誰問誰答，故須差問答人定，方得結集；其羯磨師，為別人受戒；兼請師已定，義須在眾，是故不差。

The next question is understandable. In my personal view, each focuses exclusively on one method, and thus they mutually possess or lack it. Below, it points to the Yichao; following that, it continues the objection, saying: If so, when compiling the Dharma treasury, it was also done in the assembly, so why was there a motion to depute? Answer: Compiling was done for the Saṃgha, not for a distinct individual; if not deputed, it would not be known who questions and who answers, so the questioner and respondent had to be fixed by deputation before compilation could take place. The karmadāna master receives precepts for another individual, and since the request for the master is already fixed, by principle he must be in the assembly; therefore, there is no deputation.