四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1087

2.1087

三明別乞。《善見》四句，即以去乞受食四事互論同別；但語有省略，下隨足之。初句。同乞別乞，並須兼去；以一向同乞，犯相易知，故此雙標或同或別。而下，明受持食處，此二皆同。次句。合有各乞，則具三別，唯有受同。注中辨異者。論據受同，異處亦犯；律約共處，不共故開。今須依律，故此句中略犯相也。第三。合有各乞，隱在去中，則四種皆別。第四。二別二同，四種皆備。

Third, clarifying separate alms-begging. The four propositions of the Sudarśanavinayavibhāṣā treat identity and difference mutually across the four matters of going, begging, receiving, and food; but the phrasing has omissions, which are supplied below. The first proposition: begging together and begging separately must both also involve going; since strictly begging together makes the marks of the offense easy to know, here it presents both together as either identical or separate. From "And..." onward clarifies the places of receiving and holding food; these two are both identical. The second proposition: ought to have begging separately, then possessing three differences, with only receiving being identical. As for distinguishing difference in the commentary: the treatise is based on receiving being identical, so different places also incur an offense; the Vinaya is based on sharing a place, so not being together is granted an exception. Now one must rely on the Vinaya, and therefore in this proposition the marks of the offense are omitted. The third: ought to have begging separately, hidden within going, so that all four kinds are different. The fourth: two different and two identical, with all four kinds fully present.