四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1163

2.1163

第二《了論》，初引論文。準彼無令字，寫錯不疑。次引疏解，初釋自性。即指戒體。欲下，釋求得。謂有所須。此下，釋此處。謂受食處。下云地及水中是也。與餘不須者，顯示能受法通他故。即下，簡濫，初指上能受。若下，簡餘不能。並非住自性故。被擯一種，攝四羯磨，總二十五人。若十三難人，自他俱不成；餘並自成，望不通他，故總云不成耳。（準後懺篇，學悔成受。）

Second, regarding the Vinayadvāviṃśatividyā-śāstra, first the treatise text is cited. According to that text, there is no character ling 令 ("to cause"), so there is no doubt it was a copyist's error. Next, the commentary's explanation is cited: first, explaining "own-nature" refers precisely to the precept-essence. "Desiring..." onwards explains "seeking and obtaining," meaning having something needed. "Here..." onwards explains "this place," meaning the place of receiving food, which below is referred to as "on ground and in water." "Bestowing to others who do not need it" shows that the dharma of being capable of receiving extends to others. "Namely..." onwards eliminates irregularities: first pointing out the above capable recipient. "If..." onwards eliminates others who are incapable, for none abide in the own-nature. The single category of those who have been expelled encompasses the four karmas, twenty-five persons in all. If it is one of the persons of the thirteen impediments, it is accomplished for neither oneself nor another; the others are all accomplished for oneself, but with respect to not extending to others, it is generally said to be unaccomplished. (According to the later "Chapter on Confession," one undergoing probation accomplishes reception.)