四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1391

2.1391

六中《了論》明觀量可否，初標示。此事總下三事。謂下，釋有三。白同戒者，即作法也。觀正行者，量其所作事也。律中威儀者，齊整著衣也。疏引云：所以開白，謂於死人處觀過失故，為護法故，為受依止故，為說聽法故，為有食請故；並有利故，聽往其處，須避天廟店肆婬女外道出家女處觀察遠離（此即正行）。論中又明著僧伽梨等（即律威儀）。

Under the sixth, the *Vinayadvāviṃśatividyā-śāstra* clarifies considering whether it is permissible or not. First, it presents and indicates it: this matter summarizes the three matters below. Below, 'meaning...', it explains that there are three. 'Informing a fellow precept-holder' means performing the formal procedure. 'Observing proper conduct' means evaluating the activity to be done. 'The deportment in the Vinaya' means wearing robes neatly. The Commentary quotes: 'The reason informing is allowed is: to contemplate faults in a place where someone has died; to protect the Dharma; to receive reliance; to preach or listen to the Dharma; or because there is an invitation to a meal. All these being beneficial, one is permitted to go to that place; one must avoid divine temples, shops and taverns, and the quarters of courtesans, non-Buddhists, and female renunciants, observing and staying far away from them' (this is proper conduct). The treatise also clarifies wearing the saṅghāṭī and so forth (which is Vinaya deportment).