四分律行事鈔資持記 2.2136

2.2136

正明中，初科，上二句示義。決字，古記云：字誤，合作污。（有節決字在下，於文非便。）若下，辨相染，初明不染。由入淨故。前捨說淨，即是二法。若還財下染，次明相染。田未說淨，無法簡故。前財即已懺者。乞販亦捨者，但使忘物是長，不論捨者是長非長。

Under the direct explanation, the first section: The first two lines explain the meaning. Regarding the character *jué* (determine), an ancient record states: it is a textual error and should be *wū* (defile). (Having the phrase *jié jué* below makes the phrasing awkward.) From 'If' onward distinguishes mutual contamination: first explaining non-contamination. This is because it has entered purity. The previous relinquishment and assigning to purity constitute two procedures. From 'If returning property' onward explains contamination: next explaining mutual contamination. Because the field has not yet had purity assigned, there is no procedure to distinguish it. 'The previous property' refers to what has already been confessed. 'Begging and trading are also relinquished' means that as long as the forgotten item is an extra item, it does not matter whether what was relinquished was extra or not extra.