四分律行事鈔資持記 2.2182

2.2182

三捨罪。即第三法。呵治、立誓，足上為五。下引《僧祇》者。上即義準《四分戒文》出法。猶恐循古疑非正懺，故引彼文以示同異。初指同。云字寫多，削之彌善。前下，顯異。初審見罪，義是懺前，即當說罪。下誡勿作，即今呵誓。故知前法事義已具。若準羯磨，正用彼詞。

Third, forfeiting the offense; this is the third rite. Admonishing and making a vow make five together with the above. The citation of the Mahāsāṃghika below: the above was setting forth the rite based on the Dharmaguptaka precept text through doctrinal deduction. Still fearing that following the ancients would lead to doubting it is not the correct repentance, that text is cited to show similarities and differences. First, it points out the similarities. The word "say" (云) was copied redundantly; deleting it is all the better. From "before..." onward, it reveals the differences. First, examining and recognizing the offense conceptually precedes repentance, corresponding to stating the offense. Below, admonishing not to commit it again corresponds to the present admonishment and vow. Therefore one knows that the previous procedure's matters and principles are already complete. If one follows the karmavācanā, its exact words are used.