四分律行事鈔資持記 2.281

2.281

次科中四，初列境相，又三：一以趣攝。注云等者，即修羅地獄，四合為一。二約報有三，該上六趣。三約處亦三，須通三報。此下，二定犯分齊。文列四相，二生二死，相別可見。如毛頭者，斷犯處也。律下，三明不開疑想。律云：若道作道想、若疑、若非道想，並波羅夷；文舉畜趣，餘趣同然。餘下，四示異。彼約根節，論犯分齊；口要過齒，二道過皮。此律毛頭微入即犯，性重宜急，不必待過。《戒疏》云：極微尚犯，何況餘者是也。

In the second section there are four [parts]. First, he lists the marks of the objects, which has three again: 1. subsuming by realms of existence—the note says 'and so on', which combines asura and hell realms, four into one; 2. in terms of retributions, there are three, covering the above six realms; 3. in terms of places, there are also three, which must pervade the three retributions. 'From this...' second, determines the limits of violation. The text lists four marks: two living and two dead, the difference between their marks being evident. 'As a hair's tip' marks the place where the violation is decided. 'In the Vinaya...' third, clarifies that doubt and perception are not permitted exceptions. The Vinaya states: 'If it is a path and one perceives it as a path, or has doubt, or perceives it as a non-path, all are pārājika.' The text gives the animal realm as an example; the other realms are likewise. 'The other...' fourth, shows the differences. That [school] determines the limits of violation in terms of segments of the organs: the mouth must pass the teeth, and the two paths must pass the skin. In this Vinaya, entering slightly like a hair's tip constitutes a violation; being intrinsically grave, it should be urgent, and one need not wait for it to pass. The Precept Commentary says: 'Even the infinitesimal constitutes a violation, how much more the rest'—this is it.