四分律行事鈔資持記 2.476

2.476

次科中。律明除夢，因示五過；如文所列，乃至云反此得五功德等。然文中但言過失，不明罪相，故引《五分》決之。今斷此罪，若初眠時攝意夢失，如律無犯；不攝而失，悔，五吉羅。（無記結業，準此文也。）亂意不失，理非結限；但不繫想，違律得吉；初眠即結，非是夢犯。五中，第三過者，律制思惟善法故。第四過者，律制分星月，想明相故。

In the next subsection: the Vinaya explains the exception for dreams, and in connection points out five faults; as listed in the text, up to stating that contrary to this one obtains five benefits, and so forth. However, the text only mentions faults and does not clarify the marks of the offenses; thus the Mahīśāsaka-vinaya is cited to resolve it. Now to judge this offense: if when first falling asleep one restrained the mind and then emitted in a dream, according to the Vinaya there is no offense; if one did not restrain it and emitted, upon deśanā, there are five duṣkṛtas. (That indeterminate [states] constitute karma is based on this text.) If with a distracted mind one does not emit, logically this is not the limit for constituting [the offense]; but not tethering one's thoughts violates the Vinaya and incurs a duṣkṛta; this is constituted upon first falling asleep, not an offense of the dream. Among the five, the third fault is because the Vinaya regulates contemplating wholesome teachings. The fourth fault is because the Vinaya regulates discerning the stars and the moon and focusing on the signs of dawn.