四分律行事鈔資持記 2.69

2.69

次科，初分名。世音，即彼俗語；顯上息叉，是正梵音。若下，分體。不動身口者，顯是意犯。彼但約三業，以分兩體。此下，斥謬。真諦本是西僧，得其聲實，故斥此土傳譯之失。然順彼文，且分兩別；今家特異，亦須略識。一者名通，無問輕重，但從過邊，皆突吉羅；若望行邊，竝應當學。二者體異，無論三業，故心齊重，誤皆犯輕。

In the next section, first the names are distinguished. "Worldly sound" refers to their colloquial language, showing that the aforementioned śikṣā is the correct Sanskrit phonetics. Under "If...", the essences are distinguished. "Not moving body or speech" shows that it is a mental violation. That [treatise] merely distinguishes the two essences in terms of the three karmas. Under "This...", the error is refuted. Paramārtha was originally a Western monk and possessed the sound and substance, so he refuted the translation errors transmitted in this land. However, following that text, two distinctions are provisionally made; our school's unique position must also be briefly understood: First, the name is general: regardless of light or grave, solely from the side of the fault, all are duṣkṛta; if viewed from the side of practice, all are "ought to train". Second, the essences are different: regardless of the three karmas, intentional minds are equally grave, while inadvertent errors are all light offenses.