四分律行事鈔資持記 2.812

2.812

對簡中，初引論簡畜寶。不說淨財，已犯前戒，無重犯故；若以錢買金而畜，緣相是異，則容兩犯，如《戒疏》中。又疏有四句：一是畜非貿，俗施錢寶也；二是貿非畜，用衣易錢寶也（準此，但令所貿是錢寶犯，不論能貿。）；三俱是，以錢買金畜之；四俱非，即衣物相易也。言轉易者，示戒名也。此下，簡販賣。五異指如疏者，彼云：初對人不同，貿寶七眾俱犯，貿衣唯二俗犯（在家二眾）；二貿寶自作教他，為己同犯，除為三寶，貿衣使人不犯；三貿寶一制不開，貿衣則開酥油相易；四衣寶捨則道俗不同（衣對道捨，寶對俗捨。）；五還財本非本別（衣捨還元物故云本，寶捨易淨，物故非本。）。律下，準律顯異。律有七物交互並犯；金有三品：一已成金（華敘莊嚴具是），二未成金（即金鋌也），三已成未成金（鎔瀉成器未鋋治者）；銀亦三種，錢唯一品，總為七也。但下，簡異；則知此戒唯約寶論。

In comparing and distinguishing, first it cites the treatise to distinguish keeping treasure: property not purified has already incurred an offense against the preceding precept, and there is no double violation; if one buys gold with money and keeps it, the circumstances and marks are different, so two offenses are permitted, as in the *Precept Commentary*. Furthermore, the commentary has four propositions: first, it is keeping but not trading, [namely] when laypeople donate money and treasure; second, it is trading but not keeping, [namely] using robes to exchange for money and treasure (according to this, as long as the traded item is money and treasure, it is an offense, regardless of what one trades with); third, it is both, [namely] buying gold with money and keeping it; fourth, it is neither, [namely] exchanging robes and items with each other. 'To barter and exchange' shows the name of the precept. From 'This' down, it distinguishes commercial trading. The five differences are as indicated in the commentary, which says: first, the persons involved are different: trading treasure is violated by all seven assemblies, whereas trading robes is violated only by the two lay assemblies; second, in trading treasure, doing it oneself and ordering others are both offenses when done for oneself, except when done for the Triratna, whereas in trading robes, sending another is not an offense; third, trading treasure is prohibited without exception, whereas trading robes allows the exchange of ghee and oil; fourth, regarding the forfeiture of robes and treasure, monastics and laypeople differ (robes are forfeited to monastics, while treasure is forfeited to laypeople); fifth, returning the original property versus non-original differs (robes are forfeited and the original object is returned, hence 'original'; treasure is forfeited and exchanged for pure goods, hence 'non-original'). From 'The Vinaya' down, it reveals the differences according to the Vinaya. In the Vinaya, exchanging seven items mutually constitutes an offense; gold has three grades: first, finished gold (ornaments and decorative items); second, unfinished gold (gold ingots); third, gold that is both finished and unfinished (cast into vessels but not yet refined); silver also has three kinds, and coins are of only one grade, making seven in total. Next, from 'Only' down, it distinguishes differences; thus one knows that this precept is discussed solely with regard to treasures.