四分律行事鈔資持記 3.340

3.340

五中，《僧祇》，初明展轉加受。動猶轉也。若長謂猶有餘者。注中，古師謂七日不開重受；準上體變，得更加受，則知體別不名重矣。餘如第五門說。若下，造受差別。初明穌法。須㲲漉者，恐雜時食故。記識法者，恐忘故，令憶而知之。若得下，次明油法。如穌說者，即同漉淨加記等。得麻可知。若熊下，三明脂法。亦先漉治，或中前加受，或有緣記識，故竝指如上。得甘蔗等，蔗通非時七日，果局非時。《善見》。八日犯捨者，此明記識即入法限。鑽，即煎也。問：前作記識，及後成藥，用加受否？答：前但憶持，不言藥病；詞中通泛，理必更加。若爾，中間藥成，為得幾日？答：準上《善見》，自可明之。《伽論》。作法之言，則通受持記識，二竝不成。

In the fifth [section], regarding the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya: first, it clarifies successively making additional formal acceptances. 'Dòng' (move) is like 'zhuǎn' (shift). 'If long' means there is still an excess remaining. In the interlinear note, an ancient master maintained that for seven-day [medicines], repeated formal acceptance is not permitted; [however,] based on the above point regarding alteration of the substance allowing an additional formal acceptance, one knows that when the substance is distinct, it is not termed 'repetition.' The rest is as explained in the fifth gate. 'If...' below clarifies differences in preparation and acceptance. First, it explains the method for ghee. The requirement to strain it with fine cotton cloth is out of concern that it might become mixed with timely food. The method of keeping it in mind is because of concern over forgetting, causing one to remember and know it. 'If one obtains...' below next explains the method for oil. What is said to be 'as explained for ghee' means it is the same regarding straining clean, making a mental note, and so forth. Obtaining sesame is self-evident. 'If a bear...' below thirdly explains the method for fat. It is also first strained and prepared, and either received with an additional formal acceptance before noon or kept in mind because there are circumstances; thus all these refer back to the above. 'Obtaining sugar cane,' etc.: sugar cane applies to both untimed and seven-day [medicines]; fruit is restricted to untimed [medicines]. Regarding the Samantapāsādikā, 'On the eighth day, one commits an offense of forfeiture': this clarifies that upon keeping it in mind, it immediately enters into the limit of the rule. 'Zuān' means to decoct. Question: For making a mental note previously, and when it is later accomplished as medicine, is it necessary to perform an additional formal acceptance? Answer: Previously one merely retained it in memory, not specifying medicine and illness; the wording is broad and general, so in principle one must certainly perform an additional [acceptance]. If so, how many days are permitted when the medicine is completed in the interim? Answer: Following the Samantapāsādikā above, it naturally becomes clear. In the Vinayamātṛkā, the phrase 'perform the procedure' applies to both formal acceptance and keeping in mind; neither is accomplished.