四分律行事鈔資持記 3.422

3.422

儉開八事，《四分》，初科，前引儉緣。佛下，列八事。內宿內煮，此二為賊持去，故開。自煮，因淨人盡食，故開。自取，即惡觸；因路見果，求淨人不得，為人持去故開。二食、兩果四事，同開足食。律云：早起食（即僧食也，謂早受眾食故。），從食處持餘食來（即俗食也，謂乞食食已，持餘殘來故。）；受食已，得胡桃乃至阿婆梨果（即陸果也）；食已得水中可食物（即水果也。此四並因於比丘邊作餘食法；彼或分食，或食都盡，故開。）。此之八事，從緣有八，據事唯五；以後四種同一事故。

Regarding the eight matters exempted in times of famine, in the Dharmaguptaka-vinaya: the first heading previously cites the circumstances of famine. From "Buddha..." onward, it lists the eight matters. Keeping overnight indoors and cooking indoors—these two were allowed because thieves carried [the food] off. Cooking for oneself was allowed because the pure persons ate all the food. Taking food oneself is improper touch; it was allowed because on the road one saw fruit, could not find a pure person, and it was being carried off by [other] people. The four matters of the two foods and two fruits were all exempted in common with eating to sufficiency. The vinaya says: eating early in the morning (that is, the monastic meal, meaning eating the saṃgha's meal early), bringing back leftover food from the place of eating (that is, lay food, meaning that after having begged for food and eaten, one brought back what was left over); having received food, obtaining walnuts or āmrātaka fruits (that is, land fruits); and after eating, obtaining edible things in water (that is, water fruits. All four of these were allowed because, when performing the leftover food procedure with a bhikṣu, he either divided the food or ate it all up). These eight matters are eight from their circumstances, but regarding the actual matter there are only five, because the latter four types are one and the same matter.